Combating nuclear smuggling : DHS's Phase 3 test report on advanced portal monitors does not fully disclose the limitations of the test results.
(Unknown)

Book Cover
Average Rating
Published
[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2008].
Physical Desc
i, 23 pages : digital, PDF file
Status
Unavailable/Withdrawn

Description

Loading Description...

Copies

No Copies Found

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

More Details

Published
[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2008].
Format
Unknown
Language
English

Notes

General Note
Title from title screen (viewed on Oct. 31, 2008).
General Note
"September 2008."
General Note
Paper version available from: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 441 G St., NW, Rm. LM, Washington, D.C. 20548.
General Note
"GAO-08-979."
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references.
Description
The Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) is responsible for addressing the threat of nuclear smuggling. Radiation detection portal monitors are part of the U.S. defense against such threats. In 2007, Congress required that funds for new advanced spectroscopic portal (ASP) monitors could not be spent until the Secretary of DHS certified that these machines represented a significant increase in operational effectiveness over currently deployed portal monitors. In addition to other tests, DNDO conducted the Phase 3 tests on ASPs to identify areas in which the ASPs needed improvement. GAO was asked to assess (1) the degree to which the Phase 3 test report accurately depicts the test results and (2) the appropriateness of using the Phase 3 test results to determine whether ASPs represent a significant improvement over current radiation detection equipment. GAO also agreed to provide its observations on special tests conducted by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). GAO's recommendations include proposing that the Secretary of DHS revise the Phase 3 report to better disclose test results and limitations if it is to be used in any certification decision for ASP acquisition. DHS disagreed with two of GAO's recommendations but agreed to take action on a third. GAO continues to believe that all of its recommendations need to be implemented.
System Details
System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.
System Details
Mode of access: Internet from GAO web site. Address as of 10/31/08: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08979.pdf ; current access available via PURL.

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

United States. Government Accountability Office. (2008). Combating nuclear smuggling: DHS's Phase 3 test report on advanced portal monitors does not fully disclose the limitations of the test results . U.S. Govt. Accountability Office.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

United States. Government Accountability Office. 2008. Combating Nuclear Smuggling: DHS's Phase 3 Test Report On Advanced Portal Monitors Does Not Fully Disclose the Limitations of the Test Results. U.S. Govt. Accountability Office.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

United States. Government Accountability Office. Combating Nuclear Smuggling: DHS's Phase 3 Test Report On Advanced Portal Monitors Does Not Fully Disclose the Limitations of the Test Results U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 2008.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

United States. Government Accountability Office. Combating Nuclear Smuggling: DHS's Phase 3 Test Report On Advanced Portal Monitors Does Not Fully Disclose the Limitations of the Test Results U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 2008.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.

Staff View

Loading Staff View.